This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The artricle says the propellors were removed by looters. Perhaps, but perhaps they were removed by legitimate salvage operators before anyone considered the idea of having protected wrecks? Sandpiper (talk) 10:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
IIRC, under international law warship wrecks remained the property of their respective navies, and thus any salvor would have needed the permission of the Admiralty to retrieve material from the wreck even before the protected status of a wreck being a war grave was established. Wrecks of civilian vessels operating under government control during war were also included in this restriction, as they might be carrying war materiel owned by the respective goverment.
Warships usually contained large amounts of potentially-dangerous explosive material, and they were also used for carrying valuable cargoes in wartime such as gold or silver being transferred by governments, e.g., HMS Edinburgh, so naval wrecks were given different salvage status from civilian wrecks. Similarly the SS Richard Montgomery was carrying large quantities of munitions.
The 'War Grave' status was established mainly to stop 'souvenir hunters' from taking personnel effects from wrecks in-which men had died, and then selling these personnel effects for profit with no thought for the living relatives of the dead men. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.173.52 (talk) 08:51, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There's a remarkable note on twitter here about a letter sent by Hood's widow to the wives of all the crew, giving a summary of the battle as told to her by Dannreuther. Twitter is not our best source, of course, but if this turns up in any usable sources (perhaps a biography of Hood?) it looks like it would be a good detail to include. Andrew Gray (talk) 22:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
.svg)
