Talk:HAL HF-24 Marut

Ratings

The only things keeping this one from being directly tagged as a stub are the various tables - as (1) the first indiginous Indian military aircraft and (2) the last of the Kurt Tank (= Focke-Wulf) line, this is a more important subject than your average bear, and deserves some attention from those knowedgable on the subject. - Aerobird 04:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

War history

The fighter did see action in the Indo-pakistan war of 1971. The details should be mentioned.

I do remember this page being bigger, or maybe theres another, bigger Marut page on wikipedia...This page can defnitely be expanded by leaps and bounds.. theres a lot more information available than is shown here. 155.69.5.236 07:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:HAL HF-24 Marut/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs infobox, references. Specifications and footer are complete. Also, needs much more text. As a contemporary aircraft, there is surely a wealth of information available on its development and use. Karl Dickman talk 01:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 01:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 16:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HAL HF-24 Marut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150407084138/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/1950s/Kapil-Glider.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/1950s/Kapil-Glider.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

HF-24 MARUT Rate of Climb 22.5 m/s or 4,444 ft/min

In Performance section rate of climb should be 22.5 ms or 4,444 ft/min

Why? because it is Accurate performance data obtained from IAF evaluation, that can be check all over internet or in any book ! Also if someone calculate "Time to altitude": 9 min 20 s to 12,000 m (40,000 ft) to m/s or ft/min it will get the same results !

Max climb rate - 22.5 ms (4,444ft/min) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TRUTH, JUSTICE & RIGHT WAY (talk • contribs) 05:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

1) You don't get the same results - 12000/560 = 21.4 m/s. not 22.5. 2) You cannot convert Time to altitude to an climb rate by simple division, as the climb rate is the maximum, instantaneous figure (normally at sea level) - this maximum would be expected to be much higher then the average value given by a time to altitude. 3) If the values you quote are "all over the internet" or "in any book", where are they? The only source that you quoted, militaryfactory.com is not a reliable source - while Jane's All the World's Aircraft is a high quality reliable source (who would have got their information from HAL or the Indian government). Please provide sources or revert.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)