This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Fiction
editDoes it really make sense to have a handful of random one-off fiction pieces with references to guilds? The Mandalorian, really? Is that the best example of guilds we can come up with? I think we'd be best cutting this section entirely, or at least adding context for why depictions of "guilds" in media tend to be quite different from guilds in historical fact.
Wiki Education assignment: The Middle Ages
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Totallynottai (article contribs).
structure
editThis article doesn't seem to have a good focus. Its almost entirely a history section, with a large portion focusing on women right in the middle, its full of individual example with not enough synthesis, a separate section for guilds in different countries at the end (including one on europe) after focusing on europe the entire rest of the article, and most confusingly features a giant infobox on Integralism when this article doesnt actually contain any information on any guild-based ideologies that would be relevant to an infobox on political ideology.
The women section could be spun-off into its own article, the rest restructured, and a section on political theory added to justify the infobox. Right now its just hard to navigate. ~~~ — jonas (talk) 22:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)