Wikipedia

Talk:Guerrero

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
Learn more about this page

Requested move

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by nominator ~~~~

Guerrero → Guerrero (state) — In order to disambiguate - Guerrero has many several entities like Washington as disambiguation page, see Guerrero (disambiguation). That means the said disambiguated page will likely move to Guerrero. ApprenticeFan work 14:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose This is clearly the primary topic. There may be a whole load of links on the disambiguation page, but the only one likely to rival the state is (just about possibly) the Spanish film, which is already disambiguated. This is not really analagous to Washington, where there is a difficulty determining the primary topic between the city, the president, and the state. Skinsmoke (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Withdrawn as right now. I should not request the page-move article, Skinsmoke is truly right. ApprenticeFan work 06:09, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Guerrero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The sentence stating that "civilize...the native peoples" has undeniably bigoted connotations, language to be expected in the recesses of the dark net not in a website that supposedly harbours ambitions of being taken seriously as reputable encyclopedia.

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Guerrero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Infobox flag RFC

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should this article have a flag inside the infobox? There is a discussion about it at WikiProject Mexico, where you can join and discuss it. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:30, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Anti-Black racism is subtle but ubiquitous.

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Point 1 on Anti-Black Racism. This proceeding quote from the article on the Afro-Mexican population is totally preposterous. How is it at all possible, in any way, shape or form, to determine 500 years ago, that NO OTHER conquistadors were infected with smallpox during the conquest?? And ONLY an African was 'responsible' for transmitting the disease to Mexico?? We know that 'disease warfare' was used by the Spanish in siege warfare. Why would it be the 'Christianized' African then, who is mentioned in this article as being responsible for introducing smallpox to Mexico?

"The slave of another conquistador, Pánfilo de Narváez, has been blamed for the transmission of smallpox to Nahuas in 1520. Early slaves were likely personal servants or concubines of their Spanish masters, who had been brought to Spain first and came with the conquistadors.[16][21]"

Point 2 on Anti-Black Racism

So, we are to trust a Franciscan, who was more then likely gaining enormous wealth through enslaving Indigenous peoples, was involved in the brutal Encomienda system, and then mentions the brutality of the Africans? This article thus shows no balance as no mention is made at all, as far as a quick look has determined, of Afro-Indigenous alliance and resistance to slavery. Could it be that the 'Black overseers' were forced to behave in such a manner? After all, it is fact said African's were stolen, chained and shipped to the Western Hemisphere...would that not be an example of terror induced 'criminality' at the hands of the Spanish? Both Indigenous, African and Europeans in the slave trade were equally behaving like heroes AND like demons. But yet this article is sure to mention the brutality of the Africans, without-out showing the obvious ally-ship that would of occurred between African and Indigenous enslaved peoples. This is a major problem with Wikipedia in general, ESPECIALLY when it comes to denying Afro-Indigenous inter-mixture, cultural formation and ethnogenesis. It's all Anti-Black racism without full and complete balance.

"Franciscan Toribio de Benavente Motolinia (1482-1568), who arrived in Mexico in 1524 to evangelize the Nahuas, considered blacks the "Fourth Plague" (in the manner of Biblical plagues) on Mexican Indians. He wrote "In the first years these black overseers were so absolute in their maltreatment of the Indians, over-loading them, sending them far from their land and giving them many other tasks that many Indians died because of them and at their hands, which is the worst feature of the situation."[22] In Yucatán, there were regulations attempting to prevent blacks presence in indigenous communities.[23] In Puebla, 1536 municipal regulations attempted to prevent blacks from going into the open-air market tianguis and harming indigenous women there, mandating fines and fifty lashes in the plaza.[24] In Mexico City in 1537, a number of blacks were accused of rebellion. They were executed in the main plaza (zócalo) by hanging, an event recorded in an indigenous pictorial and alphabetic manuscript.[25]" My input is meant to be on the talk page only, and not part of the main articleHubarde (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Writing 1 TR

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 16 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Angelinep30 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Ramenoisseur (talk) 00:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Guerrero&oldid=1195006697"