Talk:Green growth
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A general concept
editGreen growth is a general concept, not just a concept in South Korea. This need to be reflected in the article. I will try to improve the article soon, if not somebody else can do it more soon. Mårten Berglund (talk) 12:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. The OECD doesn't capitalize it in the source in the article. I understand Anthony's point, and that might be worth re-visiting if there's evidence that the growth of green plants is the primary topic. DrKiernan (talk) 18:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Green Growth → Green growth – This term is not a proper noun and should not be used with initial caps. Needs administrator to move over redirect with history. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 22:24, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support there is no evidence whatsoever that this is a proper noun.--174.95.111.105 (talk) 01:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Close, moved to uncontroversial moves. Apteva (talk) 21:29, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- "green growth" to many people including me, first means "vegetation growth, which is green". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Do you have any evidence outside of personal experience that most people associate Green growth with vegetation than this topic and even if that is true would having this article at Green Growth do anything to counter that confusion?--70.49.83.129 (talk) 02:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- I also noticed that this is not listed at WP:RM that needs to be changed.--70.49.83.129 (talk) 02:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Do you have any evidence outside of personal experience that most people associate Green growth with vegetation than this topic and even if that is true would having this article at Green Growth do anything to counter that confusion?--70.49.83.129 (talk) 02:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Beagel (talk) 12:42, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://beta.adb.org/sites/default/files/green-growth-resources-resilience.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Green growth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150905163317/http://www.uncsd2012.org/index.php?page=view&nr=323&type=1000&menu=126 to http://www.uncsd2012.org/index.php?page=view&type=1000&nr=323&menu=126
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160505222844/http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/trade-facilitation/green-economy-roadmap/ to http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/trade-facilitation/green-economy-roadmap
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Adding more to this article
editHi,
In the climate change wiki project, this article is listed as an article that needs updating. It says that it needs more info. Does anyone have any guidelines for what specific things this article is lacking?
Thanks!