Talk:GrapheneOS
Latest comment: 1 month ago by 2601:19E:8380:B570:9637:2CEB:8EBD:A6A7 in topic Controversies Section
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GrapheneOS article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from GrapheneOS appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 January 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 11:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
( )
GrapheneOS logo
- ... that GrapheneOS (logo pictured) is a free and open-source operating system for selected Google Pixel smartphones, which was recommended by Edward Snowden? Source: "GrapheneOS is an AOSP (Android Open Source Project)", "GrapheneOS can only be installed on certain smartphones from the Google Pixel range." "There is recognition on Twitter by Edward Snowden : "If I configured a smartphone today, I would use GrapheneOS from Daniel Micay as the basic operating system."" [1]
- Comment: Quotes for the hook are translations from German
Created by Yae4 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC).
Moved to mainspace on 16 December and nominated straight away. Article is long enough, stable, well written and referenced. Earwig's tool doesn't show any problems (many of the key sources are in German, so close paraphrasing is difficult to detect automatically, but a spotcheck shows no problems; AGF on Hungarian/Czech/Turkish sources). Hook is long enough, referenced, and certainly catchy. Image is used in the article, appropriate, and correctly licensed. Article author has no prior DYK noms, so no QPQ is required. In conclusion, good to go. Constantine ✍ 20:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Controversies Section
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Recently the Controversies was added, but in my opinion the sources do not meet Wikipedia standards to support the inclusion of this section (See WP:V, WP:RS and WP:SOCIALMEDIA).
I would like input from other editors on this matter, as the other editor involved disagrees and has claimed that criticism related to GrapheneOS in this Wikipedia article has been excluded (Special:Diff/1245602800).
My stance on this dispute is I oppose keeping the Controversies section unless sources that meet Wikipedia standards are used. 2601:19E:8380:B570:AFC3:4096:9D50:F38 (talk) 21:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, at least in its current state. I'd also like to point to WP:RGW - we need reliable sources, no matter how important the content may be considered. IP editor (I can't say a specific one, since you seem to have a dynamic IP) - if you'd like to continue working on the section, instead of editing this article again, make a page in your userspace. FifthFive (talk) 21:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Alternative
Facts that there are problems with the "leading" developer have been removed multiple times, e.g. https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=GrapheneOS&diff=prev&oldid=1218966456, https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=GrapheneOS&diff=prev&oldid=1157671308 and https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=GrapheneOS&diff=prev&oldid=1157671070
What about reverting the above linked revision instead? 2003:EE:2F18:6500:CDFE:D29C:46D0:5E74 (talk) 19:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:EE:2F16:6500:CDFE:D29C:46D0:5E74 (talk)- The issue editors had with that version was Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, I would be fine with Special:Diff/1157671070 (and maybe a mix of other versions and with some edits as needed), if it can pass with outside opinion (such as WP:RFC), to ensure that it can be allowed here without causing issues.
- (Wikipedia:Dispute resolution#Third opinion and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard may be helpful here)
- Edit: Also WP:ABOUTSELF may be helpful 2601:19E:8380:B570:BB:B3D9:BA55:B3F (talk) 20:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- The issue editors had with that version was Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, I would be fine with Special:Diff/1157671070 (and maybe a mix of other versions and with some edits as needed), if it can pass with outside opinion (such as WP:RFC), to ensure that it can be allowed here without causing issues.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.