Talk:Grand Central Publishing

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

If the original writer was creating this with a conflict of interest, I have verified and corrected information as well as dutifully sourced all information with a number of independent sources. Rtf0129 (talk) 13:23, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppets

edit

This article seems to be plagued with sockpuppets. Theroadislong (talk) 13:25, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

That may have been true, but I'm not a sockpuppet, just feel that this publishing imprint does important work, particularly their imprint Twelve. There's no difference between them an many major publishing divisions that have notable pages. Rtf0129 (talk) 13:34, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grand Central Publishing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply