Talk:Grails (framework)

Trivia?

Considering that both the name and the inspiration for the framework design both come from Ruby on Rails, I don't think that RoR should be mentioned in passing in the trivia section, but should probably be mentioned in the first paragraph of the article. just my 2 cents.

Fair use rationale for Image:Grails grails logo.jpg

Image:Grails grails logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I deleted two fair use page sections. Surely one is enough, right? 70.113.72.73 (talk) 23:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Advert?

Interesting how the introduction reads as copy-and-paste text from the Grails home page. It doesn't actually tell you anything about what Grails is, no links to clarifying subjects, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.27.158 (talk) 23:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Non-neutral point of view appears to pervade article

While I think most of the page is great, this article seems to be written from the point of view that Grails is the best thing since sliced bread. Some of the praise of Grails should be toned down a little. The 'Target Audience' section feels wrong to me, I don't see that on other pages of web frameworks.M4bwav (talk) 13:44, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, maybe is because it is the best thing since sliced bread. I lerned to use it 3 days ago and I already got a web app way better than one that took me 3 months of work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.240.140.85 (talk) 01:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Controllers confusion

Am I right in saying the fragment in Grails_(framework)#Controllers

 class BookController {
    def list() {
       [ books: Book.list() ]
    }
 }

is actually returning a Map? Or is just the Groovy syntax is terse to the point of obfuscation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.249.211 (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Grails 3.0 released

Grails 3.0 released - Maybe someone knows where this news fits in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.12.244.197 (talk) 04:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grails (framework). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100128195938/http://colinharrington.net/blog/2009/08/vmware-acquiring-springsource-which-acquired-g2one/ to http://colinharrington.net/blog/2009/08/vmware-acquiring-springsource-which-acquired-g2one/
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/65Qmg4eQj?url=http://groovy.codehaus.org/ to http://groovy.codehaus.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)