Talk:Gorakhpur

Latest comment: 9 months ago by Arjayay in topic Notable Person

File:Funeral at Rajghat1249.gif Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Funeral at Rajghat1249.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Funeral at Rajghat1249.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Gorakhnath.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Gorakhnath.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Gorakhnath.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Gorakhpur junction.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Gorakhpur junction.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Gorakhpur junction.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Gorakhpur.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Gorakhpur.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Gorakhpur.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

I see lots of content from http://gorakhpur.nic.in/gazeteer/chap2.htm and some of the other chapters. I don't have waybackmachine, so I can't be sure. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

History section

edit

I'm pretty sure almost all of the history section needs to go. This article may only have history about the city of Gorapkhpur. History about the district belongs in Gorakhpur district. Info about some ancient kingdom previously existing in the area probably belongs in a totally different article. But I'm tired now, so I'll have to work on it later. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Funeral at Rajghat1249.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Funeral at Rajghat1249.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 29 March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Funeral at Rajghat1249.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:59, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Education section

edit

In my opinion, the education section is quite long and is overburdening the article. Per WP:SPLIT, I propose that we move the list of schools into a separate article (List of schools in Gorakhpur) and leave a link here. Any objections? Qwyrxian (talk) 09:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have completed the split, leaving all of the schools on the other page. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:21, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gorakhpur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 7 October 2016

edit
  Not done: WP:EL EvergreenFir (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External Links:

edit

Reference Site: Gorakhpur - YouthHustle

Oneclickdownloadindia (talk) 16:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gorakhpur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate entries under people from Gorakhpur

edit

Raghupati Sahay and Firaq Gorakhpuri are names of one and same person Saleem Nooruddin (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Google linking

edit

This page is linked with a City in Haryana with same name by Google at all of its platforms. It is creating a big confusion. Can we do anything about it? -Jpsorts (talk) 21:26, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Gorakhpur (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:31, 11 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Merger proposal

edit

Formal request has been received to merge Maha Yogi Guru Gorakhnath Ayush University into Gorakhpur; dated: December 11, 2021. Pinging proposer @2409:4063:2394:CD5C:D55F:427A:95FC:C0B3: Discuss here. Richard3120 (talk) 19:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Support WP:TOOSOON. 2409:4063:6D02:9C46:E37F:F807:FCDD:6850 (talk) 05:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
edit

banner image is too old and very low qauilty, i am pretty sure that gorakhpur have better images than that

as native of gorakhpur this image is hurting me. RAJESHWARxSINGH (talk) 19:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notable Person

edit

Tariq Nawaz - Sr Seo Expert Rock (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done Tariq Nawaz does not have an article on the English Wikipedia, so is ineligible for inclusion. - Arjayay (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply