Talk:Google Insights for Search
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Keyword order
edit- It has been noted, however, that term order is important, and that different results will be found if the results are keywords are placed in a different order.
Isn't this just a bit stupid note from the guy writing that article? Obviously this matters, just like it does on Google.com itself. Because Google gives priority to the foremost words, as always. This isn't something that has to do with Google Insights for Search, but Google Search itself. — Northgrove 00:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Invalid source
editPlease remove the invalid source of reference on this article, namely:
http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/08/announcing-google-insights-for-search.html
There is an important exception to sourcing statements of fact or opinion: Never use self-published books, zines, websites, webforums, blogs and tweets as a source for material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the biographical material. "Self-published blogs" in this context refers to personal and group blogs; see WP:BLP § Reliable sources and WP:BLP § Using the subject as a self-published source.