Talk:Goethals Bridge

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Tom239 in topic bicycle path

Untitled

edit

The material I added was from an official Coast Guard mailing (out of Brentwood NJ, permit #36). It gives http://goethalseis.com as its web site, but this is already documented in the text.--MarkTwainOnIce 05:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

This Darned Bridge

edit

Is possibly getting replaced, can y'all help me find more links for sources? Jgcarter 23:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cleaning up the article. Our info is better than those who challenge it. Forgot to sign. --MarkTwainOnIce 03:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

0_00_oo_0

-E.L. waz hereeeee!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.247.36.18 (talk) 00:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Everyone Just a thought. It would be a good idea if all articles on bridges and roads specificied whether the structure in question has pedestrian and bicycle access. It could be included in the standard info box on the right side of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.164.201.40 (talk) 10:58, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi guys... I would like to edit this page to make some minor informational changes, such as the cost of the new bridge project, the length of the main span of the new bridge, and the height and the height limit of the new bridge. I believe this is important because it describes some important information that the average person might want to know or reference JP4119 (talk) 20:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Goethals Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

anyone taken a photo since the opening?

edit

bicycle path

edit

About the original bridge, the article says, "The bridge also had no shoulders for emergency access, or pedestrian walkways or bike paths." It had such a path in 1980. I rode my bicycle across it, on a narrow path on the north side of the bridge separated from the motor vehicle traffic. Tom239 (talk) 02:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply