Talk:Go Ahead and Break My Heart

Go Ahead and Break My Heart has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 28, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Go Ahead and Break My Heart article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Country music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gwen Stefani Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gwen Stefani, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gwen Stefani on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gwen StefaniWikipedia:WikiProject Gwen StefaniTemplate:WikiProject Gwen StefaniGwen Stefani articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Go Ahead and Break My Heart/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 20:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

GAN review coming soon... Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lead

from the → for the
as the second → as its second
as a digital download → for digital download
collaboration together → remove "together"
was handled → was solely handled
The concept for the song began after the pair shared similar insecurities with each other, leaving Shelton to write the first verse, followed by Stefani analyzing it and writing her own. → A concept can't began; reword it to sound like there were some sessions or such
who found → with them founding it

"with them founding it" is grammatically incorrect so I stated "with them finding it" instead

also appreciated → remove "also"
on the United States' → remove "the"
The release → The recording's release
day, on → remove comma

Background and composition

The duet → The release of the duet
notes to → notes of
expressed the → expressed that the
Shelton also expressed → He further explained
second. Shelton described → second, which Shelton described as:
Try to alternate word using for "duet"
It is a → It portrays a
"don't gush about their relationship in the press too much, as they try to keep some semblance of privacy. Instead, they wrote a song about it." → "[didn't] gush about their relationship in the press too much, as they [tried] to keep some semblance of privacy. Instead, they wrote a song about it."
Stefani sings about her → The lyrics of the recording delve on Stefani's
the two met → the two artists met

Critical reception

well received → well-received
hitsville" and thanking → hitsville", with her thanking
also thought → remove "also"
stating Stefani → stating that Stefani
remove "and concluded by"
selected the track → selected the recording
stating "as → stating that

Chart performance

debut, behind → remove comma
The song has sold → The track has sold (you repeat "song" twice)
in the US → in America

Live performances

sang it again → sang it additionally

Outcome

I've put this article On hold for 7 days. Good luck with editing and best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Cartoon network freak: Thanks. I believe I completed everything. Carbrera (talk) 20:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Gladly passing. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:42, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic