Talk:GoTo (US company)

LastPass price

In the opening there's a price of $125 million and then in Company history there's $110 Million... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.99.244.9 (talk) 10:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

New article

New article, non-POV, no original research, references, and not a stub. --KJRehberg (talk) 14:59, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Nice to see that we finally have a LogMeIn article getting off on the right foot. I worked on fixing up the original article but I never finished it and it is still lurking in my userspace. You might want to copy some of it into the new article or copy a few ideas from it. It is here User:DanielRigal/LogMeIn.

I see that LogMeIn is still protected. I would like to see that unprotected and redirected here. Does anybody know how to do this? --DanielRigal (talk) 23:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Request has been submitted. --KJRehberg (talk) 14:31, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I added the screenshot and logo and also list of languages + infobox e.t.c. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 13:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Protection removed with new article moved to LogMeIn with a redirect from article Logmein. --KJRehberg (talk) 14:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Just updated the LMI Free section to show the termination of LMI free as of today. I haven't done anything more than the termination note because I wouldn't be 100% impartial (as it annoyed the hell out of me), but I wonder if the fact that it was done with (as far as I can see) no advanced warning should be mentioned (basically, you get an email saying its not longer available from 21st Jan on 21st Jan, the offer of 1 year for half price and apparently you can use it for 7 more days, with it offline on 28th Jan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.67.238 (talk) 10:31, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Article tone

Please keep the tone of this article to a non-POV nature. I have already had to edit the "Product Versions" section for this purpose. This was the reason this article was deleted and protected in the first place so please don't let it happen again. --KJRehberg (talk) 14:33, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Recent Bad Changes to the Web UI

LMI recently released LMI Central and removed many features from their standard interface (including groups, sub-users, etc). Central requires a $299/year fee in addition to the fees for each computer. Many have called this a Bait and Switch tactic to get more money. Example of outcry: [[1]]. Our company has cancelled our paid service through them and have begun looking for alternative providers. If it is acceptable and someone can do it, please add in some sort of mention about this in the article. 63.163.22.233 (talk) 16:19, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

License type?

I just wanted to know what the license type is for the LogMeIn series of products - I think it is the most prioritary information concerning any software product besides its name, and it is so much missed when absent. As a matter of fact, I visited the LogMeIn website to learn about it, but found no information - seems the only way to find out is to install the product and (hopefully) be presented with the license through the installation process. I guess that the license must be some proprietary type, but would want to have some certainty about that, and that is the kind of certainty that I expect from Wikipedia. -Ignacio Agulló — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.165.145.217 (talk) 06:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

I agree: this is still needed, especially since the free version was (apparently) withdrawn in 2014. 82.28.153.207 (talk) 10:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on LogMeIn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071014100444/https://secure.logmein.com/corp/pressrelease.asp?id=49 to https://secure.logmein.com/corp/pressrelease.asp?id=49

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Preferred choice of scammers

Perhaps there should be a section mentioning that LogMeIn has often been the preferred choice of the "This is the Windows Security department - you have a virus...." scammers. Chris Fletcher (talk) 12:11, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LogMeIn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080602142647/http://sec.edgar-online.com/2008/03/07/0000950135-08-001656/Section22.asp to http://sec.edgar-online.com/2008/03/07/0000950135-08-001656/Section22.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Notability and self-promotion

This publicly-traded company page looks self-promotional and has no indication of importance.

There's a long list of products with little information. The opening paragraph are just sentences about the company's events strung together to show its growth.

I think the page, if kept, needs to be significantly cleaned up.

I think the audience would read it and think, "This company grew. But what's the importance of it?" There's a list of products with little information that doesn't benefit the reader.

I think the most notable thing about this company is that it's the owner of LastPass which may be important enough to warrant it having its own page.

At the very least, the page needs to be cleaned up. Fingercut (talk) 13:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)