Talk:Gilmour Space Technologies

Learn more about this page

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocketry

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Gilmour Space Technologies is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Companies C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

C This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Contested deletion

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (trying to create a page that starts off talking about technology we are working on as it is new. i dont see any reason for being deleted as there is a page on spacex and rocket lab which are other space companies. have tried to make it fact based and not biased in any way.) --Adam gilmour (talk) 04:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Adam gilmour: The page sat without any changes since creation which is why I placed a CSD tag. In it's current form, it doesn't credibly indicate importance for the encyclopedia. If you add more reliable sources and change the tone of the article to be neutral and less like a fact sheet, it may become encyclopedic. I will remove my nomination for now to give you time to handle this. -- Dane2007 ^talk 04:37, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

thanks, i am unsure how to attach the sources i see as i can add newspaper articles and university websites etc

ill do some investigating to see how to do that. regards adam Adam gilmour (talk) 04:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Leading company

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What makes this a “leading” company? That language is usually marketing puffery. Leading what? Says who? Nate Silva (talk) 19:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have removed it as no one has justified the claim. DatMeleeMan (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Eris-400/Eris-L?

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is the Eris 400/Eris-L launch vehicle still planned? I couldn't find any recent information regarding it. DatMeleeMan (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC) https://web.archive.org/web/20200227153939/http://www.gspacetech.com:80/launchReply

RASTA name meaning?

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Does RASTA happen to be an acronym for "Recovery And Separation systems Test Article"? DatMeleeMan (talk) 10:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Engine names

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An engine was once referred to as G-70. Does anyone know if the other engines have names and what rockets & stages they are for? DatMeleeMan (talk) 03:46, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic