Talk:Gibberellin

Latest comment: 2 years ago by EarthDragon in topic Sex Determination of Flowers

Discovery of Gibberellin

edit

We need discussion of the discovery of gibberellin here. 128.101.70.96 17:08, 20 October 2005 (UTC)lotusduckReply

I know Jake MacMillian isolated gibberellins in plants. FredTheDeadHead 19:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

This page needs a figure of a gibberellin, perhaps GA1. I took out the figure that was there as it was not correct.Sarahjg 21:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bad Math

edit

"research that started [...] in the mid-1960s led to its commercial use [...] throughout California by 1962" seems to imply time travel. 108.234.224.230 (talk) 19:14, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Gibberellin/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Many of the references are not accessible publicly as they require a login to a private site. Nev12345 (talk) 18:52, 9 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 18:52, 9 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 16:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gibberellin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:42, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gibberellin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Current number known

edit

Hello @Silica19: and welcome. I found almost nothing to correct but there was one thing: "As of now" becomes incorrect quickly. Giving the date/year works and for that there is a template {{As of|2010}} and {{as of|2010|lc=yes}}. (I don't know why this is better than just writing As of however I assume it is tracked somewhere if it needs to be updated.) Invasive Spices (talk) 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello! You're right, I should've added a year. Why did you choose 2010 when the latest article referenced for the fact is of 2020? Silica19 (talk) 17:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I looked at the 2010 article and that said 136 so I assumed you meant that one. If that is still true in the 2020 ref then change it. Invasive Spices (talk) 29 January 2022 (UTC)
I've corrected it. Silica19 (talk) 07:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Transport Of GA

edit

Multiple members of the NPF family exhibit GA transport activities. A screen for mutant plants defective in root accumulation of fluorescein-tagged GA (GA-Fls) identified NPF3.1 as a putative GA transporter. GA transport activity of NPF3.1 was examined in Xenopus oocytes using GA-Fls and GAs with subsequent LC-MS analyses. NPF3.1 was shown to import GA4 and, to a lesser extent, also GA1 and GA3 in a pH-dependent manner, consistent with the proton motive force-dependence of the NPF transporter family. NPF3.1 loss-of-function plants did not exhibit GA-related phenotypes, perhaps due to functional redundancy. Identification of many GA transporters was possible using novel screening strategies, which overcame the limitation of the conventional strategy of observing phenotypes of single gene knockout mutants. Such new screening methods are particularly important for plant hormone transporter research since there are likely many hormone transporters with similar and overlapping functions. EarthDragon (talk) 11:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sex Determination of Flowers

edit

GA also help in sex determination of flowers. It should be added in biological functions. EarthDragon (talk) 11:44, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply