Wikipedia

Talk:Gettin' Over You

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Stop reverting

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

KEEP this is a relevant promo single.--HC 5555 (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Page name

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page moved. The cleanup discussed below will still need to be done. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Gettin' Over You → Gettin' Over — I know the single is called "Gettin' Over You" but the song on the album is called "Gettin' Over" and so its a little contradictory to call this page by the single's name and then say it is from the album One Love. The song in its original form was released as a promotional single therefore i think the song should be called by its original name just like the pussycat Doll's song "Hush Hush" was remixed and retitled "Hush Hush; Hush Hush" for its single release.Lil-unique1 (talk) 00:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

on iTunes - link - new version of one love can be found. track #2 is called "Gettin' Over You". this version of song is released as single. because of that my opinion is that article should stay on "Gettin' Over You"--SveroH (talk) 08:22, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
I support the move. Articles about songs are supposed to be about the songs themselves, not just the single releases. The song was originally titled "Gettin' Over" and "Gettin' over You" appears to be simply a name for the single. The article should be moved to "Gettin' Over" but the infobox title should remain as "Gettin' over You". If consensus determines otherwise, then the article should be moved to "Gettin' over You" as prepositions with less than five letters should be lowercased. –Chase (talk) 22:52, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Agreeing with the comments by chase... the original version of the song was released as a promotional single first so again i ask should the page not be renamed as "Gettin' Over".Lil-unique1 (talk) 11:15, 29 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
i was looking on other articles on Wikipedia. i change my opinion, and agree with Lil-unique1--SveroH (talk) 17:54, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Agree that the page should be renamed. Also there's a big problem here - the infobox has the information about the remix, not the single as it was released last year. The remix should receive a subsection, but not the infobox. -- Erroneuz1 (talk) 06:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Infobox

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

I don't think that infobox should be about promo single release. look at If We Ever Meet Again for an example. single was released as promo single. but infobox is about singles official release not promo. even better see: Hush Hush. page is titled Hush Hush, but infobox has info about "Hush Hush; Hush Hush", the remix. same ting should be done here--SveroH (talk) 20:14, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

That's totally inaccurate then. This article is about the single, not the remix. The remix is a subsection of the original single. -- Erroneuz1 (talk) 02:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
disagree. The original version (the song) as we refer to it is simply a promo, the actual single is (what you're referring to as remix) "Gettin' Over You". New versions of the album feature it and the frank value is that "Gettin' Over You" is the video, it is the single and it is what is charting. This is correct per wiki guidelines as it is the most up to date information. We cant even source the promo release.Lil-unique1 (talk) 03:19, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Well you would be wrong, because the original version was on the UK singles chart. Just because there is a remix as of March 2010 does not change what the article was about prior to March 2010, which is the song. A remix is a subsection of the song. Here's your source: [1] -- Erroneuz1 (talk) 15:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
That's fine i never doubted that the original version charted but charting alone does not make it a single. So far both me and SveroH agree that the main body of the article should be about the single which is called "Gettin' over You", and not about the song ("Gettin' Over" which was a promotional release. This is the same situation as "Hush Hush" by the Pussycat Dolls where the original version charted in Russia but the remix was promoted as the single. Both SveroH and Chase agreed in the discussion above that "Gettin' Over You" should remain in the infobox. Unless a consensus in this discussion decides otherwise that's how it will stay.Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
There is no reference to the original music video e.g. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu0JS7nmQMw so this article is incomplete. Also disagree about the remix. The "19-2000" (Soulchild Remix) by Gorillaz is what received the airplay and charted but the wikipedia article refers to the original mix. Same goes for "Clint Eastwood" (Ed Case/Sweetie Irie Refix Edit), which is noted in the wikipedia article a follows, "The Ed Case remix was the version most played on UK radio stations during the single's original chart run." The article refers to "Clint Eastwood". Therefore you have made this page inconsistent with other music pages and industry standards/norms. Recommend a rethink before I pull up more reasons why this article is incomplete and inconsistent.Bennopia (talk) 12:20, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Second cover

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is second cover neeeded? Per WP:NFCC: 3a) Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information. I do not see how cover with just few words meets that. I think that second cover should be deleted.--SveroH (talk) 21:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Gettin' Over You (feat. Fergie & LMFAO) - Single.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

An image used in this article, File:Gettin' Over You (feat. Fergie & LMFAO) - Single.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gettin' Over You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gettin' Over You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gettin%27_Over_You&oldid=1202274474"