Talk:Gerry (2002 film)

Rating

I removed the sentence that said that the MPAA rated the theatrical version R and the edited version PG-13. Filmratings.com (The Classification and Rating Administration) makes no mention of an edited version. http://www.filmratings.com/search.html?filmTitle=gerry&x=50&y=11 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Construct3 (talk • contribs) 14:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Ending

Sure that Gerry strangled Gerry? I thought it was something like a hug.

Guess it was ment to be ambiguous, "smthn like a hug" or strangling or whatever80.171.47.169 16:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Gerry Poster.jpg

Image:Gerry Poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Spoilers

I've removed the annotation of the plot summary with the warning "spoilers" according to our guideline, Wikipedia:Spoiler. --Tony Sidaway 15:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Gerry Poster.jpg

Image:Gerry Poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Setting

The article mentions the three different locations it was filmed it, yet not where it was set. The Kodikian / Couglin case happened in New Mexico - is that the location the film is portrayed to be in? Nietzsche 2 (talk) 02:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

The setting is (intentionally) ambiguous. Presumably America. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dale c-a (talk • contribs) 22:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gerry (2002 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060227031652/http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/movies/film/documents/02720644.htm to http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/movies/film/documents/02720644.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160302140631/http://www.elle.fr/Loisirs/Cinema/News/Chantal-Akerman-retour-sur-la-carriere-d-une-cineaste-discrete-3002285 to http://www.elle.fr/Loisirs/Cinema/News/Chantal-Akerman-retour-sur-la-carriere-d-une-cineaste-discrete-3002285

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)