Genyornis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Genyornis is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
As the human arrival in Australia is more than 40,000 yrs ago, the fact that Genyornis disappeared in a short period of time is quite absurd, as it disappeared no less than 10-15,000 yrs later. It cannot be a proof of blitzkrieg and hardly a over-exploitation (along with 10,000 yr co-extincence?). Wikipedians should take a BETTER look to this issue, instead to parrot only the 'blitzkrieg' apologysts, already weakened by the virtual 'extermination' of the 'clovis-first' theory' (and so bye bye also to N.America blitzkrieg). Here it's a interesting debate that would worth more attenction: http://www.abc.net.au/science/future/theses/theses1.htmS.M.71 (talk) 19:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
