Talk:General Dynamics X-62 VISTA
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the General Dynamics X-62 VISTA article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judging from the chat sites on the net, F-16 VISTA and F-35 STOVL are not really comparable. In fact, 360 degree thrust vectoring would be impossible on the F-35. So any risk reduction provided by VISTA yould have been operational rather than in terms of engineering design. It's been suggested tyat 360 degree thrust vectoring might return for 6th generation aircraft, if we ever get that far with manned jet fighters. 20.133.0.13 (talk) 12:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on General Dynamics F-16 VISTA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091020104940/http://www.codeonemagazine.com/archives/1991/articles/jan_91/jan2a_91.html to http://www.codeonemagazine.com/archives/1991/articles/jan_91/jan2a_91.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080125223722/http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/gallery/Photo/F-16XL1/index.html to http://www1.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/F-16XL1/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080201180139/http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/F-16XL2/index.html to http://www1.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/F-16XL2/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Supermaneuverable
editThe Supermaneuverability article has this plane as being supermaneuverable. Should this attribute be getting a mention in this article? Boscaswell talk 08:38, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This page is significantly out of date and contains multiple factual errors.
editI am the Director of Research at the USAF TPS and the Program Lead for the X-62 VISTA, and have found quite a few errors on this page, from the basic description of the aircraft, to its current use, who is involved with the current program, and also its performance characteristics (the VISTA does not have the same performance characteristics of a standard F-16). I would like to rewrite this page to make it more factually correct. Is there anyone that I should collaborate with to ensure edits I make are properly made? We are still documenting the aircraft changes, and not all changes are correctly listed by media outlets. Ccotting (talk) 21:04, 1 January 2023 (UTC)