Talk:Gelesis100
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Rytyho usa in topic Neutrality and sensationalism
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Gelesis100.
|
Neutrality and sensationalism
editThis article has been tagged for neutrality and sensationalism or material that reads like a press-release. Personally, I think the article is neutral and even handed in its current state and the references are of good quality (secondary sources, mostly from medical journals). Does anyone have any other thoughts? Ways the article could be improved? Or should the tags be removed? Rytyho usa (talk) 08:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Rytyho usa, it clearly reads like a brochure for the drug. Onel5969 TT me 16:51, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- I've made several changes to the article. What are your thoughts about its current state? Rytyho usa (talk) 03:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- onel5969, I agree it would be more helpful to propose some changes in a "change X to Y" format to make your concerns clearer. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 07:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have addressed apparent issues and removed the associated tags. If you feel further improvements are warranted, I encourage you to make the necessary adjustments, or identify clearly the issues on this talk page for others to address. Thanks for your helpon the article. Rytyho usa (talk) 07:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- onel5969, I agree it would be more helpful to propose some changes in a "change X to Y" format to make your concerns clearer. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 07:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- I've made several changes to the article. What are your thoughts about its current state? Rytyho usa (talk) 03:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)