Talk:Francisco Liriano

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jd22292 in topic Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2017

Bias

edit

The second paragraph needs to be re written, it is somewhat biased and does not resemble an encyclopedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BDNYanks021 (talkcontribs) 04:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

How's that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mientkiewicz5508 (talkcontribs) 21:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Notable Games Section

edit

It just seems a little tacky. Are these really milestones yet? What if he goes 3-8 the rest of the way? Are there any guidelines for what should be noted? AlanzoB 17:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think we should remove it. None of those games are really that notable. Perry 03:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't feel strongly either way, but the game against the Astros was nationally televised, and there were a lot of enthusiastic articles about Liriano afterward. I doubt he would have made the all-star game without the TV exposure. --Akhilleus (talk) 05:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Please rework the last game in the "Notable Games" section. Present tense isn't good for an encyclopedia article. 198.176.160.10 15:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Francisco Liriano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2017

edit

The deal is official now 67.86.57.10 (talk) 19:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

No, it isn't. The latest MLB source clearly states that the trade is pending confirmation by the Jays and Astros. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 19:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: per above. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply