Talk:Fractal-generating software

Untitled

Please do not reduce this article to a stub. It has useful information that is easily checked. In its restored form it embodies basic knowledge of fractal software that is shared by all people who use such software. An article on soap does not require a citation in support of the statement that many people use soap to wash.

If people have a concern about the article they can raise it here and allow a discussion to take place.Soler97 (talk) 20:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Even in the list form it's still a stub - in fact, technically it's more stubby in that form, since stubs are usually classified as such on the basis of their text ignoring any templates or lists. I agree, though, it makes more sense keeping the list of examples separate. The features, however, are another matter, and may well be better served by a paragraph. Grutness...wha? 22:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I agree that the article is not great, but that is no reason to make it worse. In its original form it was written in paragraphs but got reduced to points. I don't like articles written in point form and I had the impression that wikipedia discourages the practice, but this is how it ended up. You're welcome to redraft the features list as a paragraph but it will probably be reverted to list form.Soler97 (talk) 20:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

I've had a go - hopefully it'll be acceptable to whoever keeps reverting it. I've added a bit of info from my partner (she works as a fractal artist and mathematician). Grutness...wha? 00:22, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

It looks OK to me. Let's see how it goes. Soler97 (talk) 05:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Seems to me the best way to treat features would be a table, but that would make an article with little prose even less readable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.188.164.248 (talk) 17:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

External links

We need to agree which external links this page should contain. 71.42.88.198 has added external links on various occasions going back to January 2009. Various editors, myself included, have removed them on the grounds that Wikipedia is not designed to be a repository for external links. Rather than start an edit war, let's talk about it. My view is that the list of Fractal Generating Software should only contain links to other pages on Wikipedia (or be placeholders to pages that could be written in due course). The External Links section should probably be deleted, as there is no need for it. 81.174.151.142 (talk) 15:40, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

{{edit request}} Hi, I have written this [1] here based on solely academic interest, and it is the only one available which can dynamically generate escape time fractals based on mathematical expressions passed to it.. It has all the other features of coloring, color blending too, and open sourced, free. written in .NET and/or mono. Can you guys please evaluate and take a look and decide if it is appropriate to be added here? In specificity [2] and [3] these type of rendering is never before seen, as there *is not a single one 2 dimensional fractal viewer* capable of doing it. Thank you folks.

Section removed; discuss possible reinstatement below. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  22:47, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

The section was put back, under the new heading of "List of notable fractal-generating softwares". This began in August 2013, and several editors were beginning to add links to it again. Nobody had come back here to argue the case for doing this; there were comments in the page source warning against adding links unnecessarily, which were ignored. I've removed the section again. If anyone thinks User:Ekabhishek was right to start rebuilding the section, please explain why. JROakley (talk) 10:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Suggestion for another fractal generating application to be included here. Does not seem to have a Wikipedia page. http://www.fractalsciencekit.com/ Ronelling (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)ronelling This particular application, ChaosPro, can use the parameter files of some of the applications listed in the article like FractInt and UltraFractal. http://www.chaospro.de/ Ronelling (talk) 15:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)ronelling

Suggestions for another modern fractal application, Fractorium, I'm not sure that it deserves it's own wikipedia page, but it would be nice to link to as it's OSS and non-commercial. SethT (talk) 09:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Types

To be more comprehensive this page needs to identify more of the types of fractals generated as suggested at this page. It should also explain these methods. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Fractal curves

The is nothing about the generation of fractal curves. All of these were produced with various methods, many of which aren't mentioned. I don't have the advanced understanding of mathematics required to comprehend how the various fractal types differ. This article would benefit from a mathematics pro to get to B class. - Shiftchange (talk) 06:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia article about "mandelbulber"

Hello Wikipedians,

is it recommended to create an extra article for "mandelbulber" or to integrate it into another article?

Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 17:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)