Talk:Fourier–Motzkin elimination

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2A00:23C8:7B09:FA01:40CB:9260:295F:C18E in topic Appears not to be correct


Untitled

edit

why on earth are variable denoted with \xi ? What's wrong with regular old "x"? The overuse of Greek symbols does nothing but put people off

Ghaa!! Shun all who want to cheapen mathematics by making it easier to learn!! LoL

"Double-exponential computational complexity" isn't too clear. How about an explanation in Big-Oh notation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.152.246.210 (talk) 19:57, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Appears not to be correct

edit

"Define the history   of an inequality   as the set of indexes of inequalities from the initial system   used to produce  .

[...]

A variable   is in the set as soon as at least one inequality in the history   of   results from the elimination of  ."

AFAICT, the underlined part cannot be correct. NO inequalities in   result from any elimination, since these are the starting set. I suppose it should instead say something like "... the elimination of   is involved anywhere in the process of creating  "? 2A00:23C8:7B09:FA01:40CB:9260:295F:C18E (talk) 21:21, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply