| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fort Bridgewoods article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled
editThe owner of www.forts.org.uk has copied this text into Wikipedia. See http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Fort_Charlotte
WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
editArticle reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Spelling
editShould this article be "Bridgewood" or "Bridgewoods" ? I ask because both forms of spelling are used in the article. Consistent it is not. RASAM (talk) 16:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Bridgewoods. The external link pdf calls it that, and has a photo with that name. Local history booklets and Saunders Fortress Britain use the plural Vicarage (talk) 22:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Then it might be a good idea to move this article to Fort Bridgewoods, and for consistency, edit the text accordingly. At the moment it is a rather pointless redirect. What do you think Vicarage ? (By the way, I'll do the text, if you do the moving; or tell me how to do it). RASAM (talk) 20:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Good idea, but I fear moving the article would upset the wikipedian gods, as I don't know the protocol. Can I leave the whole thing to you. Vicarage (talk) 05:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- As I said above, I'll do the text, but I don't know how to move the page; if you are in the same boat, we're both snookered and that's a shame. RASAM (talk) 23:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)