 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Rewrite
editI've rewritten and hopefully cleaned up virtually the whole article. I've removed the sections on the message board curse and ROBO-PUNTER because, to be honest, I think they're pretty much non-notable and only of interest to people who frequent the site's message boards. Barnas 20:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
ROBO-PUNTER almost certainly belongs. The idea of fairly assessing value, including theoretical maximum value for a given position, is entirely in line with Football Outsiders' "SABRmetric" approach to analysis. 12.159.137.232 (talk) 15:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
I've never edited or contributed on Wikipedia before, so forgive me if this isn't formatted right. There is a sentence that reads "Over the course of time, the site added more writers, and hosed Gregg Easterbrook for part of 2003." Is that a typo? Did they host him, or hose him? 99.22.111.42 (talk) 03:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC)skrame
Robo Punter
editYou doubt the relevance of Robo-Punter?
- I have seen the robopunter thread, and it does not deserve a separate article here. I've added a merge template so we do not have a separate article for that.DandyDan2007 (talk) 11:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- I merged it with this article. Enigma message 18:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)