Talk:Football League Centenary Trophy/GA1

GA Review

Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 16:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Me once again. Having a look at this interesting piece. MWright96 (talk) 16:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

"The clubs which qualified for the tournament were last season's top eight" - slightly reword this sentence to The clubs which qualifed for the tournament were the previous season's top eight

"Liverpool recorded the biggest win of the round, beating" - defeating
"Newcastle United needed extra time to overcome opponents Wimbledon" - Newcastle United needed extra time to overcome their opponents Wimbledon

Jan Mølby should have the flag of Denmark and not the Scottish flag before his name in the Goalscorers table

You created another fine piece of work here. On hold as usual until the issues have been addressed. MWright96 (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much @MWright96: for taking a look at this (and good spot on the Mølby flag!) have made corrections. Lemonade51 (talk) 21:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
- Lovely. Can now give this article the GA symbol. MWright96 (talk) 21:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply