Talk:Flora of Australia (series)

Fair use rationale for Image:Flora of australia.jpg

Image:Flora of australia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability not questionable

The notability of a 59 volume botanical series that has described over 20,000 Australian flora and published at least 861 new names of taxa in 1981 alone should not be in question.

See

• Australian Biological Resources Study
• https://www.ipni.org/p/3340-2
• https://www.jstor.org/stable/1224123
• https://www.publish.csiro.au/sb/sb16020
• https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745(2004)107%5B596:FOAVAL%5D2.0.CO;2
• and many more from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=%22Flora+of+Australia%22+series&hl=en&as_sdt=0,15

– Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 20:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)