Talk:Fitness function

Robotics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page.

Molecular Biology: COMPBIO

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Evolutionary Algorithms Scope / citations missing

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello everyone, I am new to Wikipedia discussion, anyways I'd like to contribute to subjects in the scope of Evolutionary Algorithms since I write my diploma on that very subject. I wonder why this page is not related to the appropriate algorithms portal, because the fitness function is certainly essential to genetic algorithms and at a higher level as objective function to other algorithms as well.

In some of the related articles are citations missing or IMO wrongly presented like [Back 1996] which seems to be a copy-paste from someones LaTeX bibliography. I am happy to supply some citations or correct the wrong ones. I'd just wanted to let you know :)

Philipppixel (talk) 18:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

A ha, great! An expert! Thanks for sharing knowledge! Is there a fundamental difference with the fitness landscape, which also has a more expanded Wikipedia article? Should both be merged? I'll rather ask this here than add a Merge proposal on top of the fitness function-page. BertSeghers (talk) 12:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Basic article revision

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The old article, which was limited to some general statements about the nature and importance of evaluation in EAs, has been substantially revised and fleshed out, and several source citations have been added. Thus, the maintenance tag on missing citations was removed. Studi90 (talk) 17:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic