Talk:Fiat Fiorino

Name of merged article

• If the Citroen and Fiat articles are merged what is the proposed name of the new article? Boatman (talk) 17:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
• I would oppose it. The congruence with the Nemo applies only to the latest incarnation of the Fiorino Chrisj1948 (talk) 22:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

This is good point, I think the merge isnt good option, Ill remove the merge tags... -->Typ932 ^T·C 11:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

• I strongly oppose the change as the article would suffer if they were merged, as always happens the article would focus on just one model and barely mention the others.I just rewrote some of this article and there is more to add if anyone has the time. Jenova20 09:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Image

To the anonymous ip who spends a lot of time flopping images around ad infinitum: There is no rule saying that the most recent generation should be used. However, using a Peugeot to illustrate "Fiat Fiorino" is clearly problematic. Please discuss before you re-revert again.  Mr.choppers | ✎  14:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fiat Fiorino. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100414030433/http://www.clube147.hpg.ig.com.br:80/cronologia147.htm to http://www.clube147.hpg.ig.com.br/cronologia147.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://annualreport.psa-peugeot-citroen.com/wp-content/themes/psa/pdf/pdf/PSA-2012-03_memento_en.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.psa-peugeot-citroen.com/fr/pagebuilder/downloadpackage/2293?pid=-1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)