Talk:Fernando Primo de Rivera

Untitled

This article is a traslation of es:Fernando Primo de Rivera. But, the spanish article has copyright (there was an old problem about the licence of http://www.biografiasyvidas.com and we have several articles from that page). The article must be deleted.--FAR 09:45, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

If it's a copyright violation, the best course of action would be to reqrite the article, rather than delete it. Miguel Cervantes 14:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

I think the problem is fixed now. Miguel Cervantes 15:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I´m a newbie in en:, and I didn´t know what was the correct template. I write in es.wikipedia.--FAR 20:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Requested move 3 May 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 20:15, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

---

Fernando Primo de Rivera, 1st Marquis of Estella → Fernando Primo de Rivera – No need to append his title. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 00:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC) Srnec (talk) 06:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

• Support. Based on the article titles policy, the proposed move better meets the 5 criteria for proper article titles than the current title. The shorter title is of course more concise, yet still precise, is more natural and is recognizable, and is consistent with how most other articles on Spanish Governor-Generals of the Philippines are titled. In addition, the shorter name is better per WP:COMMONNAME. This move request is a no-brainer. —seav (talk) 15:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
• Oppose: per WP:NCNT, noble titles should be included in the title. @Seav, the reason why some Governor-Generals of the Philippines do not have titles following their names is because they didn't have a title, many Governor-Generals did have titles however and they are included in the article title, a small sample to this effect is: José Malcampo, 3rd Marquis of San Rafael, Ramón Blanco, 1st Marquis of Peña Plata, Camilo de Polavieja, 1st Marquis of Polavieja, Valeriano Weyler, 1st Duke of Rubí, José Basco y Vargas, 1st Count of the Conquest of Batanes Islands, and Francisco José de Ovando, 1st Marquis of Brindisi. Ebonelm (talk) 15:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your opposition is wholly based on WP:NCNT and you never refuted my argument that the proposed move better follows the article titles policy. One is a policy, the other is a naming convention/guideline. Why should a guideline trump policy? Furthermore, WP:NCNT allows for exceptions where the title is not appended, such as Elizabeth II. So just mentioning WP:NCNT is not convincing. —seav (talk) 15:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

• Oppose per the WP:NCNT convention. RGloucester — ☎ 19:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Where does that convention suggest this title? There is only one famous Fernando Primo de Rivera in history and appending his marquisal title is only confusing. It makes the reader ask himself, "Is this the Fernando Primo de Rivera I'm looking for?" He is not well known in English by his title. Srnec (talk) 20:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

• Comment. Some contributors will oppose this move "Per WP:NCNT" and only that reason. This is not a convincing reason. Please see the excellent remarks of the closing admin on the requested move for Elizabeth II at Talk:Elizabeth II/Article title:

Finally, many believe that the naming convention should simply be applied without exception for the sake of consistency. That argument is also valid, since consistency is indeed an objective of article naming per WP:AT, but it is not persuasive, because it does not address how the longer title conforms with the other four stated objectives of the naming policy: recognizability, ease of finding, preciseness and conciseness. In particular, the editors who are of this view do not generally address the strong empirical evidence that "Elizabeth II" is very likely the most recognizable name as envisaged by WP:AT, which as a policy takes precedence over a guideline-level naming convention. Also, this position does not take into account that occasional exceptions may apply to guidelines, per WP:GUIDES, and indeed they generally do not address at all under which circumstances an exception would be appropriate, thereby in effect treating the naming convention as a policy, which it is not.

As I stated in my support !vote above, the shorter title better meets the article titles policy and this should have a larger consideration over a guideline such as WP:NCNT. —seav (talk) 22:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

• Comment. The article on Fernando's nephew (the Spanish dictator) is at the shorter and original article title of Miguel Primo de Rivera, and has been moved from Miguel Primo de Rivera, 2nd Marquis of Estella over 2 years ago without any protest. So this is another piece of evidence that adherence to WP:NCNT guideline is not mandatory. Per policy, article titles should be concise and not overly precise, which the shorter title does so perfectly. —seav (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
• Support. The plain name is the WP:COMMONNAME.--RioHondo (talk) 03:54, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
• Support. Fernando Primo de Rivera is the WP:COMMONNAME, not to mention more WP:CONCISE.--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
• Support per WP:COMMONNAME. Cavarrone 10:34, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Parents

"Fernando Primo de Rivera was the son of Antonio Hermenegildo Primo de Rivera y Sobremonte and his wife Ana María de Torres Rovellas y Peña Vélez (1811–1865) ..."

According at least to the Spanish Wikipedia, his father is José Primo de Rivera. --INS Pirat (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)