Talk:Fear Street (film series)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected status(?)

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I don't know when this article was moved to the main space, as there is no alert in my drafts that this was done. Regardless of this, there is persistent editors who continue to change the format and layout. They have stated that franchise/film series articles should not include film tables, which is factually incorrect. A quick sample of various film series articles will show that it is a common element that shows commonalities in the varying installments. I have brought this up here, as this article which continues to have reverts/re-edits/etc may need a protected status, once there is a consensus reached. Pinging recent editors, to state their opinions, Users: Mcrsftdog, Gooey98, MainlyTwelve, SpecialContributions:2001:8003:CCF2:4900:B934:594D:5064:7880, User contribution:101.176.138.38, User Contribution:101.176.138.38, Sock, Legaiaflame, Vikenviksingh, and SecondLooneyaccount. Cheers m8s!--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 21:17, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

User:DisneyMetalhead seems to be referring to deletes by User:Vikenviksingh.[1] These deletes[2][3] seem to misunderstand the purpose of the Infobox which according to the guidelines at MOS:INFOBOX "the purpose of an infobox: to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article".

There may be other arguments to be made about avoiding tables and using more meaningful WP:PROSE instead but the reasons User:Vikenviksingh stated for his deletes was incorrect, and they should discuss before making any further deletes. Deletes by one user does not seem reason enough to lock or protect the article. -- 109.78.196.125 (talk) 00:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@109.78.196.125 thank you for your input. Agreed that so far it has been one editor. My proposition above was simply to attempt to maintain the integrity of the article, should continued deletions continue and lead to behaviors of edit-warring. Cheers m8! If anyone else has input, please speak.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 13:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic