Talk:Fairchild Swearingen Metroliner
Latest comment: 3 years ago by MilborneOne in topic Don’t put FlyPelican out of Fairchild Swearingen Metroliner
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fairchild Swearingen Metroliner article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cargo capacity
editThis article gives a cargo capacity of 4 cubic meters, which is implausible, even if the citation is truthful. Other sources give about 4x that cargo capacity. Suggest a fact (or math/unit) check and new reference for the cargo capacity. 67.169.166.36 (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Removed, not supported by Jane's 1982-83. Figure has been there since the early days of this article and possibly relates to the rear luggage compartment of an earlier variant. Jane's gives 490 cu ft for the fuselage 45 cu ft for the nose luggage compartment and 136 cu ft for the rear compartment. Volumes are rarely given in specs sections, more relevant is weight (of cargo). Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 09:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Don’t put FlyPelican out of Fairchild Swearingen Metroliner
editPlease stop erasing FlyPelican out of the Fairchild Swearingen Metro because the plane has worked with and is currently in FlyPelican right now, so please stop erasing it. Xavierromelf (talk) 17:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Have you a reliable source according to FlyPelican they operate Jetstreams, and they would need to operate a large number to appear in the infobox. MilborneOne (talk) 17:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)