Talk:Excitation (magnetic)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Викидим in topic Voltage and current

The article says "A 240 volt, 5 amp load appears to be a 240 amp load when driven with 5 volts" This assumes that the load takes a constant power. If it is a resitive load then the current is proportional to the voltage, so a 240 volt 5 amp resitive load (48 ohm) appears to be a 0.02 amp load when driven with 5 volts. TimMorley (talk) 13:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I make it 0.104 amp (5/48) but I agree that the original claim is dubious. Biscuittin (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Out of date?

edit

I'm wondering if the whole of this article has been sourced from the same 1917 book as the picture. It is all about DC machines which are no longer used in power stations. Biscuittin (talk) 18:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

(years later) I was at a hydro plant in July 2011 and it uses DC machines for generator excitation. True, they didn't *sell* any DC power, but the machines are still around and still useful. --Wtshymanski (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Voltage and current

edit
The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

"The shunt-wound generator output varies with the current draw, while the magneto output is steady regardless of load variations". I disagree with this. The voltage of any generator will fall as the current increases (because of armature resistance) unless a compensatory winding is fitted. Biscuittin (talk) 19:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Suggest merge

edit
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Close proposal: No support for merge in 3 years.


Shunt generator can be merged here. We also should describe excitation of motors. --Wtshymanski (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Also need to describe load/voltage regulation characteristics for generators, and speed/load characteristics for motors. --Wtshymanski (talk) 14:26, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose merge There is nothing in either of these articles to merge. Our task to write content from scratch. We can do this equally well under either title, and would probably be best doing it, as appropriate, under both. Overlap is not a problem. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:40, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Note that this was previously discussed at Talk:Electric_generator#Merge_of_Shunt_generator Andy Dingley (talk) 13:41, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

This not fully accurate...if a generator is seperately excited, then the problem of voltage varying with load current can be overcome due to independant source controlling the field magnetism. Also, there is no need to merge articles as each is a defined area of study. Robert 0850 13 Feb 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadgill (talkcontribs) 14:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.