Talk:Europa Press
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Raydann in topic Requested move 20 September 2023
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 20 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Europa Press (news agency) to Europa Press. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 20 September 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 20:35, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
– I just changed 250+ links from Europa Press to Europa Press (news agency). There are only 5 articles that now link to Europa Press. It's likely that future links to Europa Press (made with brackets or the |author-link=
parameter) will refer to the current news agency, not the small publishing house that ceased operations over 80 years ago. Thank you for your consideration. GoingBatty (talk) 03:42, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Tentative support as per above. I would examine providing more geographical insight in the "About" template headlining the publishing house article.--Asqueladd (talk) 08:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support. Pageviews also show that the 1930s publisher is not the primary topic. Search results are exclusively for the modern agency. Making only the second move and making Europa Press a dab to include Europapress is also an option. Certes (talk) 10:13, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support at least disambiguate. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.