This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Estradiol acetate article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The molecule shown and named in the infobox is the 17-beta acetate ester (IUPAC (17β)-3-hydroxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-yl acetate), whereas "estradiol acetate" (INN, USAN) refers to the 3-O ester (IUPAC (17β)-Hydroxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-3-yl acetate).
Femring and femtrace (named in the article) are documented to use Estradiol acetate (USAN) with UNII number : 5R97F5H93P (see here for example, section Ingredient and appearance) which give us through the FDA website the InChIKey FHXBMXJMKMWVRG-SLHNCBLASA-N which is the 3-O ester as shown here.
I do not know how to create molecule scheme up to WP standard so i'll just remove it from the info box. I'll also change the IUPAC name, CAS number, ... If anybody could provide a new image, it would be wonderful. - ElianeCBriand (talk) 10:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply