Talk:Essiac
Latest comment: 3 years ago by CorbieVreccan in topic Perennial target for addition of opinion, unsourced or poorly sourced content
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to complementary and alternative medicine, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Essiac article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Essiac be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Canada may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Perennial target for addition of opinion, unsourced or poorly sourced content
editI have semi-ed the page. I have edited here, so anyone with issues with this, feel free to ask for changes in protection level at WP:RFPP. I've only set if for two months, but I predict indef coming shortly. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 23:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)