Talk:Ernest Radcliffe Bond/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by MrWooHoo in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 01:47, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hey Matty! I noticed that you have a section on your talk page about getting "British people up to GA", and I am a GA reviewer after all. ;) This article looks in good shape! I'll try and wrap this review up in 7 days, but quicker would be better :D


Review

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    There are some redlinks that could be fixed, however.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Lead could be longer, but the rest of the article does follow MOS.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Major aspects covered!
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    More images would be nice, but no images (well there is an image) is okay according to this policy, however you may want to get some more images when (I assume?) you are nominating this article to FA.
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
    See above.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: 
    Waiting on comments. Brandon (MrWooHoo)Talk to Brandon! 01:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
    Pass :D Brandon (MrWooHoo)Talk to Brandon! 15:05, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit

This is almost a perfect article, but there are some prose tweaks that could be done. The redlinks could be replaced I just read this :P. Question, can the "Personal life" section be expanded? Cheers! Brandon (MrWooHoo)Talk to Brandon! 01:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi MrWooHoo, thanks for the review. I have given the personal life a bit of expansion, but there isn't really that much to say. (I am not sure if it is long enough for FA.) Thanks again, Matty.007 13:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks for expanding the section :D. Quick-pass :D Brandon (MrWooHoo)Talk to Brandon! 15:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply