This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
An editor editing from @West Yellowhead: and @199.213.91.1: has repeatedly attempted to remove File:Eric Rosendahl 2015.jpg from this article variably on the grounds of "inaccurate and offensive", that it was "posted by someone who doesn't support this individual", the "location the picture claims to be from is not from there", and (from my talk page) that it is "vulgar". In every case, these claims are either (a) false and/or (b) not a valid reason for removing an image. I've invited the editor to this talk page, but they preferred to continue to edit war after the invitation. The editor in question has inferred a legal threat which I have asked them to withdraw (and they have not), and also claims to work for Mr. Rosendahl, and has so far not complied with our requirements at paid editing. They have also uploaded an image to Commons at File:Rosendahl Eric1 (2) (002).jpg for which they have no proof of ownership nor proof they are the legally designated copyright agent of the Alberta NDP Caucus. I have placed that image for deletion. In a last ditch hope of resolving this issue, I post here hoping the editor in question will engage in discussion. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:52, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Given the lack of discussion by the party wishing to remove this image, despite being pinged and invited multiple times, I've restored the image. There's no credible reason for removal. The claims of it being "vulgar", partisan, or a copyright violation are all patently and/or provably false. No justifiable reason for removal has been given. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
_(002).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}