Talk:Erez Crossing

Latest comment: 7 months ago by MajesticRZ in topic Biased sources which make unsupported claims

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 November 2018

edit

The last paragraph is politically motivated, is largely irrelevant to the topic, and should either be deleted or be edited to remain non-controversial and on topic. SBril (talk) 22:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 05:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
I think they wanted the last paragraph deleted? Irtapil (talk) 12:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 September 2020

edit

The sentence "a railway line connecting Israel and Gaza" is awkward because one is a city and the other is a country. Please amend to "a railway line connecting Ashkelon and Gaza" to make it more specific. Crash48 (talk) 13:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

To editor Crash48:   Not done: "Gaza" is a city, yes; however, "Gaza" is also a shortened name for Gaza Strip, a Palestinian territory. So it is okay to say that the railway line connects Israel and Gaza (the Gaza Strip). Thank you for your suggestion! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 15:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Would you then amend it to "a railway line connecting Israel and the Gaza Strip" to eliminate the ambiguity? --Crash48 (talk) 15:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
To editor Crash48:   done. And thanks again! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 16:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

script lang

edit

why did the template use script tags instead of {{lang-ar}} us there a reason for that? Irtapil (talk) 12:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Biased sources which make unsupported claims

edit

This article cites sources that are clearly biased and make unsupported claims, upon which information presented herein relies. The editors who included these citations should be warned, and the entire Wikipedia entry taken down until such misinformation is removed. Failure to do this is has serious local and geopolitical repercussions, as misinformation can lead to voters make decisions on erroneous information and lead activists to share unsupported (and inaccurate) information to the general public. 2001:861:4E40:270:F116:EBF5:552:E26A (talk) 13:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

You should be specific about what sources are biased and what claims that result from those sources. Wikipedia will remove misinformation if the community agrees it's misinformation, but you first have to tell us what you think is misinformation.
MajesticRZ (talk) 22:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply