Talk:Equivalence (formal languages)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Jochen Burghardt in topic Generative Capacity
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Equivalence (formal languages) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Strong generative capacity page were merged into Equivalence (formal languages) on 10 June 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
[Untitled]
editProposed merge per external link I've added, which is the sole source for the 1-line stubs. It's all the same song based on Chomsky (1963). JMP EAX (talk) 01:18, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Done Klbrain (talk) 10:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Generative Capacity
editThe article mentions strong generative capacity and has a link to weak generative capacity (which redirects back to this article), but this article does not explain how that is relevant to equivalence. Maybe elaborate on it?
2606:6000:6793:7500:21DB:23DB:A4E9:3180 (talk) 05:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- For now, I just removed the circular link and fleshed out the Bach/Miller reference. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:08, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- I elaborated on generative capacity, and added an example for weak, but not string grammar equivalence. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)