Talk:Entropy: Zero 2
(Redirected from Talk:Entropy : Zero 2)
Latest comment: 8 months ago by A412 in topic Requested move 13 April 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Entropy: Zero 2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Entropy: Zero 2" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Requested move 13 April 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved. ~ A412 talk! 17:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Entropy : Zero 2 → Entropy: Zero 2 – Contested WP:COMMONNAME move. The game is universally referred to as Entropy: Zero 2 (without the stylized spacing) by RS, and by this article's own sourcing: PC Gamer, PCGamesN, TheGamer, GameRant, NME. Per WP:OFFICIALNAME, we should use the name sources use to refer to the game, not a "correct" or "official" name. ~ A412 talk! 16:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- @IDKFA-93: courtesy ping ~ A412 talk! 16:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping and for the links to the article title policies (this is my first time actually creating an article from scratch and I wasn't entirely aware of them, apologies if my actions seemed disruptive).
- After taking a look through the bullet points, I'm no longer entirely opposed to re-moving the article to "Entropy: Zero 2"; but if this happens, do you think it would be best to revise the contents of the article to use the "Entropy: Zero 2" name, or should the stylized ones be used instead? IDKFA-93 (talk) 17:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- The typical style is to use the "common name" throughout while acknowledging the stylized name: for example Insane 2: Insane 2 (stylized as In2ane) or Nier: Automata: Nier: Automata (stylized as NieR:Automata). ~ A412 talk! 17:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's what I thought; I've gone ahead and made the appropriate adjustments and moved the article. Apologies again if my previous actions seemed disruptive and unneeded. IDKFA-93 (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- No, I don't think your actions were disruptive, I think this is a perfect example of of the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. ~ A412 talk! 17:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's what I thought; I've gone ahead and made the appropriate adjustments and moved the article. Apologies again if my previous actions seemed disruptive and unneeded. IDKFA-93 (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- The typical style is to use the "common name" throughout while acknowledging the stylized name: for example Insane 2: Insane 2 (stylized as In2ane) or Nier: Automata: Nier: Automata (stylized as NieR:Automata). ~ A412 talk! 17:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.