Talk:Emily Jones
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 98.217.208.100 in topic Requested move
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move page back to original location. →Wordbuilder (talk)
Move returns the article to its previous location. Move was made without discussion and is unnecessary. Per Wikipedia:Hatnote#Two articles with similar titles (emphasis added), "When two articles share the same title, except that one is disambiguated and the other not, the undisambiguated article should include a hatnote with a link to the other article. It is not necessary to create a separate disambiguation page." →Wordbuilder (talk) 04:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support The reporter is the only current candidate for the title Emily Jones; the other Emily Jones – who seems an unlikely search target – can be linked from a dabhat. --Rogerb67 (talk) 03:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support. This should not have been moved. No need for a dab page for only two articles whose titles are already disambiguated. A hatnote is sufficient. Station1 (talk) 06:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Move Back. Per all of the above. --Born2cycle (talk) 02:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Emily Jones is married to Fort Worth? Isn't that polygamy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.217.208.100 (talk) 01:15, 24 September 2013 (UTC)