Talk:Emergency Response Team (RCMP)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Veracity

edit

It's not impossible that this is RCMP during a public exhibition, but there's absolutely no proof one way or the other that this isn't, say, a cosplayer, except the photographer's say-so. Can we see a link to a page about, or an official communication from the RCMP regarding, the public exhibition in question? Thanks. --81.5.170.9 (talk) 10:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Early formation inaccuracy

edit

My father was on one of the original teams and he noticed an error in this article. It says the ERT team was modelled after the HARP team but that's not actually correct. The ERT team came first in 1976, and HARP followed shortly after. Trying to find a citation to back this up, but thought I would bring it to attention for now.

HubertMW (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Emergency Response Team (RCMP). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply