Talk:Emanuel Sandhu

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Sexuality

edit

What is about his sexuality? It is said that he is gay and some web sources claim that he is openly about his sexuality. --Plywak 15:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Don't believe everything you read on the internet. Unless he officially comes out, it doesn't belong on his wikipedia page. Kolindigo 19:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

"This win was even more amazing because ..." 'amazing' seems to be an adjective of opinion... is there a better word out there? its starting to sound eerily like his website... "amazingly smart and sexy, brilliant beyond compare, possibly the world's best...." etc etc Subrosita (talk) 08:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emanuel Sandhu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply