Talk:Elisheva Carlebach Jofen

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Akiva100 in topic Her professional name is Carlebach

Her professional name is Carlebach

edit

All the links and records show that she does not use her married name professionally. Thus the main title name for this article should remain as Elisheva Carlebach. IZAK 13:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Her personal name should be utilized for the article. Joseph (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
There is a lot of information about her career that is biographical. Shouldn't her husband's information and her genealogy be listed under personal information and the heading about her career include material about her academic career? Akiva100 (talk) 21:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elisheva Carlebach Jofen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply