Talk:Eduroam

Needs help

Citations need to be more than raw links, the uncited litany of sites probably is too detailed, and there are many uncited dated statements. W Nowicki (talk) 20:06, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

These issues have been addressed through a thorough revision of the article in August 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haringkop (talk • contribs) 13:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

[untitled]

Came here to try to find the individuals responsible for inventing eduroam, and which universities they worked for. Just got names of consortiums. Heroes of university IT, the individuals responsible should be properly credited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.159.196.14 (talk) 16:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Also available in China.

Peking University has joined Eduroam since March, 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:DA8:201:1106:D89D:2254:DC56:A55F (talk) 13:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eduroam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131224090002/http://www.canarie.ca/templates/news/releases/CAF_million_logins_en.pdf to http://www.canarie.ca/templates/news/releases/CAF_million_logins_en.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Multiple issues?

I wonder which issues are to be solved. The note at the beginning of the article says:

• This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: pov, no names of people involved, opaque wordy explanations, uninformative. (April 2020)
• The neutrality of this article is disputed. (April 2020)

Who disputes the neutrality of this article and why? Why aren't more details given here at the talk page? What is meant by "no names of people involved"? I don't think that the article is uninformative. --Gunnar (talk) 16:26, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Agree with Gunnar, eduroam has always been a group effort, although Klaas Wieringa (who worked for SURFnet at the time) was one of the key people involved and has been acknowledged as the father of eduroam. The article is pretty neutral in tone. --spaetow