Untitled

edit

This appears to be a copy from http://www.geographyiq.com/countries/ez/Czech_Republic_economy_summary.htm, which has at the bottom of the page, the following: Copyright © 2002-2003 GeographyIQ.com. All Rights Reserved. -- Zoe

No. They are plagiarizing the State Department, and the material is in the public domain. Can we sue them? I'd love to. Koyaanis Qatsi
I sent an email to http://www.symmetrictech.com/contact.asp, asking them to explain their copyright claim. -- Zoe

Cleanup requested

edit

The article contains very obsolete facts and doesn't reflect current (post 2000) ones. It is much missing all the problems that happened here and its over-enthusiastic tone is very incorrect. I put cleanup tag here with hope of someone more knowledgeable will do the cleanup. Pavel Vozenilek 01:06, 9 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Complete rewrite would be better. ackoz   23:53, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

1993 as a "crucial" date

edit

I'd like to see the table of content redone and 1993 integrated as a crucial date.

  • it is the birth of the Czech Republic, so the real start of this article (before we are summarizing what should be Economy of Czechoslovakia
  • an important aspect thereof is the agreement between Czechia and Slovakia on the split of their economies (currency, federal state's debt, federal state's assets, etc.)

--Diligent 10:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


What is the economic system of Czech Republic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.217.34 (talk) 19:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rewrite

edit

All of the state department stuff is still in the article, and is incredibly out of date now, talking about the year 2000 in the future tense, 7 years later. Czech has changed so much since 2000 that this article cannot be consisdered complete or accurate in any way now. 81.0.212.117 14:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Current account vs Trade balance

edit

The article talks about current account deficits but then mostly talks about imports/exports, wouldn't it be better to discuss trade deficit? For example, Czechia has trade balance surplus but still runs current account deficit about 3% GDP mostly due to dividend transfers. If, in fact, using "current account" is better in this context, could it be explained in one or two sentences why? --Jirka6 04:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

This is one of the most outdated, incomplete and unbalanced articles I have seen on wiki. It really needs to be updated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.55.187 (talk) 15:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I added the template. Most of the things about privatizations and transitions are inaccurate, POV or just outdated. Unfortunately I have no time to work on it. If sb has time, more than welcome.--Desyman44 (talk) 13:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Request for rewrite

edit

This is a very poor article . It needs to be thoroughly rewritten.

Removal of empty/useless sections

edit

I think the "Statistical indicators" section should be deleted as it doesnt contain anything. Also the "Background" section just repeats the info box. Is it ok to delete those? If so, where the pictures from Background should go? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.221.198.205 (talk) 23:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Economy of the Czech Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Economy of the Czech Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Economy of the Czech Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply