Talk:Ebell of Los Angeles

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

A fact from Ebell of Los Angeles appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June 2008, and was viewed approximately 4,900 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that young Judy Garland was discovered, and Amelia Earhart made her last public appearance, at Ebell of Los Angeles (pictured)?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/June.

Wikipedia

"Temple"?

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In this article, George Sidney is quoted as saying the following: "There was a theater here in Los Angeles called the Wilshire-Ebell. It was connected with a temple...."

There is no mention of any temple in the rest of the article. It's not even clear what he means: a Jewish temple? a Masonic temple? architecture reminiscent of a temple?

Could the relevant information be added to the article? or, if he was wrong and there is no temple connection, could we delete this portion of his quotation and replace it with ellipses so as not to mislead the readers? — Lawrence King ^(talk) 20:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good point. I found no indication that Ebell was associated with a temple, though it is located across the street from the Masonic Temple. To avoid confusion, and absent verification of a connection, I followed your suggestion and deleted this portion of the quote and replaced with ellipses.Cbl62 (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ebell of Los Angeles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002104315/http://www.preservation.lacity.org/monuments/ to http://preservation.lacity.org/monuments

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic