Talk:Eagle Mountain, California
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_Gold_color.svg)
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in California may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Comment
editAw, shoot! I wrote this, but the wiki credited my ISP. Oh, well. Questions, comments or whatever are welcome here and on my talk page. - Lucky 6.9 9 July 2005 03:25 (UTC)
can somebody add this important information that's proposed for Eagle Mountain? It looks like it's going through: http://www.eaglemountainenergy.net/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.102.7.232 (talk) 21:10, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
mine pit was sold and approved
editthere is an article in la times that eagle crest got approval to use the pit for generation purposes 172.248.21.50 (talk) 23:32, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
oh it was on kcet http://www.kcet.org/news/rewire/the-grid/hydroelectric-energy-joshua-tree-national-park-eagle-mountain.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.248.21.50 (talk) 23:35, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Add solar plant
edithttp://www.desertsun.com/story/tech/science/energy/2016/11/22/eagle-mountain-hydropower-gets-boost-nextera/94082674/ is referenced related to hydropower in the article, but it also mentions that the "Desert Sunlight" 550MW solar installation is there - I was looking at the Google Maps satellite image and wondering what that was. Should be added to the article under resurgence, I suppose. Greg (talk) 23:10, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Eagle Mountain, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514232046/http://www.ccaej.org/projects/desert_protection/pe_9_21_05.html to http://www.ccaej.org/projects/desert_protection/pe_9_21_05.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013034959/http://www.filminlandempire.com/misc/credits_main.htm to http://www.filminlandempire.com/misc/credits_main.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013034959/http://www.filminlandempire.com/misc/credits_main.htm to http://www.filminlandempire.com/misc/credits_main.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150619062842/http://www.history.com/shows/top-gear/videos/eagle-mountain to http://www.history.com/shows/top-gear/videos/eagle-mountain
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)