Talk:EMKA, Ltd.

Something interesting about this article... (Updated)

I quote, "Paramount sold a majority of their pre-1950 theatrical sound library (including films by Cecil B. DeMille and Preston Sturges) to MCA, and thus, through their new dummy company, EMKA, they were able to make a profit via airings on television." So, that would mean that EMKA was actually a dummy company for Paramount, meaning that Paramount & it's parent company would actually own EMKA and it's holdings. MCA never owned it at all. 98.193.77.218 (talk) 03:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Having looked at the above statement now, I realize how stupid it sounds & would like to apologize for interpreting the quoted statement wrong. I now realize it was NEVER implied that EMKA was formed by Paramount. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 09:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Universal Studios

This article is a stub that may not meet WP:NOTABLE in companies. I'd say that this information be condensed into a new section in the merge to article discussing the sale of the Paramount library to Universal. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) C 22:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Luxoman237

I disagree. It is important to inform people about what the history of this company. However their may be a link to this page on the Universal Studios page. Luxoman237 (talk) 22:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

aguyintobooks

I cant see that this is anything other than a shell corporation (it even says in the article "in name only") as a company made for the sake of the name, i cant see the relevance of a separate article.

Aguyintobooks (talk) 21:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)